(03) 9908 2160
enquiries@harc.com.au

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Interstation Area Issue #1357

    zmatar
    Participant

    Hi,

    Seperate but similar query to the above.

    A colleague has recently tried to run an old RORB model that has two interstation areas. He has used the parameter file attached. The supplied paramter file format was required so as to be compatible with the automation tool – Storm Injector. We’ve used the RORB CMD instructions that have been provided by HARC (attached).

    When we checked the .out files, there was no Kc or initial loss values defined as shown in the snip provided in the second attachment. We’ve raised this with the developer of Storm injector and they’ve suggested we contact HARC directly as it appears related to the RORB cmd.exe file.

    Any idea where we’ve gone wrong with our parameter file or if this is a potential bug?

    Apologies for any duplicate attachments.
    Cheers
    ZM

    • This reply was modified 10 months, 3 weeks ago by  zmatar.
    • This reply was modified 10 months, 3 weeks ago by  zmatar.
    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: Interstation Area Issue #1354

    zmatar
    Participant

    Hi,

    Seperate but similar query to the above.

    A colleague has recently tried to run an old RORB model that has two interstation areas. He has used the parameter file attached (first attachment). When we checked the .out files, there was no Kc or initial loss values defined as shown in the snip provided in the second attachment.

    Any idea where we’ve gone wrong with our parameter file or if this is a potential bug? We’ve used the RORB CMD instructions that have been provided by HARC (third attachment).

    Cheers
    Zaki

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: RORB_CMD.exe and Rainfall Excess Hydrographs #1353

    zmatar
    Participant

    Hi David,

    Could you advise on a rough timeframe for when the next release of RORB will be available? We were anticipating something in July per above, particularly something which addresses this bug and from what I hear potentially another bug to do with the naming of subarea prints in an out file (RORB calcs vs GE).

    Thanks
    Zaki

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)